Return to the Source: Democracy is Dead

By Margaret Kimberley

Source: Black Agenda Report

By what stretch of the imagination can the US be a democracy when ordinary citizens have virtually no influence over what their government does?

“The disregard of popular will is obvious for all to see.”

“Return to the Source” is a series in The Black Agenda Review that reprints previously-published interventions by Black Agenda Reportcontributors. Our title is inspired by an address delivered by Amilcar Cabral  on October 15, 1972 at Lincoln University and reprinted in the collection Return to the Source: Selected Speech by Amilcar Cabral  (1973). Cabral’s address was titled “Identity and Dignity in the Context of the National Liberation Struggle.” In it, he argued that a “return to the source” was critical to revolutionary transformation—a return to the ideas, culture, and demands that served as the foundational impetus for the struggle for African liberation. Guided by Cabral’s analysis, we will return to some of the “classic” interventions by Black Agenda Report contributors, revisiting their tremendous insights into the contemporary conditions of the Black World. 

We are launching the series by reprinting BAR columnist and Prejudential  author Margaret Kimberley’s incisive commentary “Democracy is Dead.” Originally published on April 23, 2014, Kimberley describes the domination of the US democratic process by capital, the abandoning of the working classes by the state, and the perplexing tendency of most US citizens to “suspend disbelief” while holding tight to the myth of US exceptionalism. Her analysis is as relevant now as it was when originally written.

Democracy is Dead 

by Margaret Kimberley

“The notion that this country is a democracy has become openly farcical.”

Too many Americans love to boast that the United States is a democracy. That idea is accepted uncritically and celebrated as proof of this country’s superiority. Every public activity and event is an opportunity for the false narrative to be repeated and indulged. Events as disparate as elections, holiday celebrations, advertisements, school commencements and religious worship are all used to propagandize and create false belief about the degree of power the average citizen has vis a vis their government. Of course all evidence shows that this narrative is and always was a lie. Dictionaries define democracy as government representing the citizens through elected representatives, or as majority rule, or a society which provides equal rights to all. The history of this country has rarely lived up to any of those descriptions but in the recent past the notion that this country is a democracy has become openly farcical. We have nothing but meaningless trappings and any power exercised by the people is sadly in short supply.

This state of affairs has been obvious to anyone who has been paying close attention. Americans not only don’t get what they want from the political system, they actually get the opposite of what they want. The pace of the oligarchic state has quickened lately but the dynamic has been evident for quite some time.

“Americans get the opposite of what they want.”

Even elite academia is taking notice and has given official imprimatur to a conversation that had been ignored. Professors Martin Gilens of Princeton University and Benjamin Page of Northwestern University are the authors of the study  “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” While their work does not as news stories suggest use the word oligarchy, the authors are quite clear about their findings. Professor Gilens gave this brief summary  of their conclusions:

“I’d say that contrary to what decades of political science research might lead you to believe, ordinary citizens have virtually no influence over what their government does in the United States [italics mine]. And economic elites and interest groups, especially those representing business, have a substantial degree of influence. Government policy-making over the last few decades reflects the preferences of those groups – of economic elites and of organized interests.”

While this study has however briefly changed public discourse, it is important to note that the disregard of popular will is obvious for all to see. If this were not true, the minimum wage would be higher, there would be no cuts to entitlement programs, and Americans would have a single payer health care system. There would be no NAFTA or TPP free trade agreements which force a race to the bottom for workers, destroy entire eco-systems and violate national and popular sovereignty. If this country were truly democratic, the city of Detroit would not have filed for bankruptcy for the simple reason that voters in Detroit and in the state of Michigan voted to repeal the emergency manager law which brought bankruptcy into being.

“Disregard of popular will is obvious for all to see.”

Americans don’t want the increasingly frequent interventions abroad forced upon by them by president after president yet that is what they get. We want to address the problems created by human made climate change. We don’t want hydraulic fracturing, or the pollution or earthquakes that come with it, but that is what we have. We don’t want rich people to control the political process but the Supreme Court has said time and again that money equals speech and those decisions prove the point of the study. Simply put, money talks and those without money have no voice.

If that were not the case, American workers would not be poorer than their counterparts in the rest of the world. The so-called middle class  workers in this country had the distinction of being better off than their peers around the world. That is no longer the case with stagnating wages and job loss and a country that does not practice income distribution that would keep people out of poverty. In a democratic country, Walmart and its low wages would not be the largest employer. The manufacturing that once dominated the economic landscape would still employ the bulk of the work force with its higher wages and other benefits that provide economic security.

In a democracy, the financial services industry that created the worldwide economic meltdown would not have been bailed out. Workers would be bailed out. Corporations wouldn’t get tax breaks and other government subsidies. Workers would get them. And if the average person had any say in the matter, the big time banksters would now be behind bars.

“In a democratic country, Walmart and its low wages would not be the largest employer.”

The myth of American democracy is just one of many that are cherished out of ignorance and suspension of disbelief but that is not a reason to continue the confusion and self-delusion. The only time we get any taste of democracy is when we proclaim that we don’t have it but assert plainly and loudly that we intend to get it.

The phony narrative wears thin as the quality of life diminishes. The United States of America is not a democratic nation if the only right that citizens have is to go to a polling place every few years. It is time to stop fetishizing what clearly does not work for the majority of people and start talking about something new. After all, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over but expecting a different result. The only result we have to show is rule by the elites and if that is acceptable then the people have gone truly insane.

This entry was posted in Authoritarianism, Corporate Crime, culture, Dystopia, Economics, elites, Empire, Geopolitics, imperialism, Inequality, news, Oligarchy, propaganda, Social Control, Social Engineering, society, State Crime and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Return to the Source: Democracy is Dead

  1. The US is democratic republic. Democracy is a method in which the majority of citizens get to choose their representatives in the government through the ballot process. A republic is a state ruled by representatives of the citizenry who themselves are sovereign. What the author refers to is democratic referendum or direct democracy. Rarely practiced but a good idea. Also, most folks don’t follow the legislative process, know how bills are drafted, or know much about civics. Getting money out of politics is the goal to stopping corruption in government. But a national referendum would have to be done through the electoral college process to be fair to the citizens of all states. Corporations may be “persons” under the law, but they’re not citizens. They shouldn’t be lobbying or drafting legislation. Unfortunately most folks don’t understand economics enough to make smart decisions concerning overall monetary policy (how to create jobs domestically).

    • Other appropriate descriptors for US government: Oligarchy, Plutocracy, Corporatocracy, Kleptocracy, Technocracy, Kakistocracy.

      Democracy is a long-buried aspect of the republic (but can be glimpsed on rare occasions in-between ongoing efforts to suppress it).

      • nomad says:

        also pathocracy. or as i like to say, just to be emphatic, psychopathocracy. idiocracy also seems apt.

      • nomad says:

        i keep trying to decide which -ocracy is most accurate. they all apply but dont quite get to the bedrock essence. i feel the need to makeup a word. its a criminocracy but a special kind. in a criminocracy the politicians are interested in enriching themselves at the expense of the citizens. american political criminals are interested in that as well. but they also have an empirical agenda. using illegal and amoral means to advance the cause of empire. gangsterocracy? we are ruled by gangsters.

        • Modern government has become such a complex system of competing criminal interests it can be difficult to describe. Most labels we give it depends on the predominant characteristic dispayed in a particular context. In our current moment the US is an Oligarchy and Kakistocracy, a failed state and gangster state infused with elements of techno-feudalism and neoliberal fascism. Unfortunately there’s not a simpler term that can convey the variety and scope of the empire’s disfunction, corruption and psychopathy.

          • nomad says:

            i hear you. but im speaking in a general rather than particular contexts. certainly all of those -ocracies find expression in the gangster empire. given what i have observed of america, particularly this century, the other -ocracies are subordinate to the overriding meta-ocracy of gangsterism. america is primarily a gangsterocracy.

          • In the most fundamental aspect (ie. use of violence/intimidation and the relentless pursuit of power and wealth), that’s accurate.

          • nomad says:

            nice little country you have there. be a shame if something happened to it.

          • …of course for the right price we’ll manage your resources and protect you. it’s an offer you can’t refuse.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.